I think my terminology is correct actually. I climbed Mt. Rainier in a self-sufficient manner, no fixed-ropes or rope on any part of the climb (including the almost vertical face we climbed that should have required rope), we carried all of our own gear (food and all). For those 3 days we were on the mountain, my friend and I (climbing party of two) were the only people at Camp Muir that were not attached to a Guide service and the only ones on that part of the mountain in a self-sufficient manner. I can't speak for the other Camps. Essentially, I believe my friend and I cover not only the definition of "Wikipedia" but a fair portion of the mountaineering community's interpretation of climbing "Alpine-style."
I would not call myself an Alpinist however as that to me defines a person who is technically proficient in all facets of mountaineering and climbing while combining the definition of "Alpine-style" climbing. Most of us climb mountains in some way or another, "Alpine-style." And my interpretation of "climbing" would be having to depend on crampons, ice axe(in a winter environment), climbing shoes, chalk (in a summer environment) or doing something other than only walking/hiking to reach your desired point whether it be a boulder, rock face, hill or mountain(But then again crampons are needed for places one would normally walk had there not been any ice or snow). We all hike some small or large portion of any mountain we attempt but there are parts of a mountain, like Mt. Rainier (if you choose to), that we actually climb using climbing techniques with or without the aid of rope and other people.
I know this is topic can be debated and will be debated forever and I kindly remind you that this is just an interpretation and by all means not the universal definition for everyone.
Cheers and have fun in the mountains!
JH
Last edited by jhonda; 09/22/10 10:11 PM.