Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#44902 02/14/08 05:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
HI,

I have been considering purchasing snowshoes, but I am not sure how to decide between all the options. What features should I be looking for? How do I decide the best weight, size, model, brand, etc? I will probably be using them for day trips mostly or maybe an overnight. I currently live near the Sierras, but I also spend a lot of time in the Rockies. Should the different types of snow affect my decision? Does anyone have a "favorite pair" or something that has worked well for them? Thank you!

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
Member
Member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
The Denali Evo Ascents seem to be popular if you're going to be doing any steeper grades or tougher hikes. It's also nice because you can get an extra 6" tail for extra lift on the days when you're carrying a heavy pack or your in super soft snow. Seems to be a very versatile snowshoe.

http://www.msrgear.com/snowshoes/denalievoascent.asp

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,391
Member
Member

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,391
Agreed, I LOVE my Denali AScent Evo's. The only trouble I've ever had is on slopes of greater than 35-40deg, when the heel lock tended to collapse. I'm not sure why. They do really well on traverses as well, since they have both the foot crampons and the teeth on the edges of the shoe for traction.

Used them all last weekend with a big pack, and they were great!

-L cool


Flickr Pics

Think outside the Zone.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,871
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,871
Rent before you buy. Most everyone will defend their purchase of a particular type of snowshoe.

Body, packweight and type of snow will determine the shoes you need. I have a friend who has 22", 25" and 30" shoes for different conditions.

The rule of thumb is 1 sq. in. for every pound of body and packweight. A 9" x 25" snowshoe will accommodate 225 pounds.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 37
Member
Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 37
TSL is not very known in the USA, but they are one the most popular snowshoes in Europe and especially in the mountaineering community. I have a TSL 225, it a composite plastic step-in type. They also make a bunch of models with strap bindings. I prefer step-ins in anything i can buy.
I believe they are now starting to do business in the USA but you won't find them in stores or for rent. You can buy off their website....google them for the web address (Search word TSL snowshoes)

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
I have an old pair of Tubbs which are 1/3 larger than anything on the market right now, and I still posthole now and then. I was looking at the new shoes and they are too small !! no flotation at all, they may be fast on hard pack but who needs em there?

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 354
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 354
I have the Redfeather (one of the cheaper models). They work great for general use, maybe not so much for steep icy traverses, but then I'd be wearing crampons anyway. While they don't have the extreme crampons the MSRs do, they do have a hinged crampon at the toe and a fixed one at the heal. They are also very light, so I don't mind so much carrying them just in case.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
I used MSR Lightning Ascents for my trip up Whitney via the North Fork of Lone Pine Creek last month. They performed superbly, and I can't imagine making the approach in anything else.

The cookie-cutter frame really bites nicely into hard snow, and you can (sort of) front-point steep terrain with the integrated crampon.

Downsides: the "televator" heel lifter occasionally collapses (doesn't stay put), and the bindings came undone once or twice. Also, there was one place on 40-degree terrain that I thought I could get away with on the snowshoes (rather than switching to crampons) but soon found myself immobilized as the shoes failed to bite into anything at all. [I was traversing/downclimbing]

But all in all, the snowshoe of choice if you're going up North Fork in the dead of winter.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 904
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 904
ms2119

Just bought the MSR Lightning Ascents at REI today (on clearance). Was there any particular situation that caused your bindings to come undone?

Can't wait to try them out!

MC smile


"The mountains are measured for their height but the achievements of one who climbs the mountains are immeasurable." m.c.
http://www.facebook.com/keepclimbing
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 47
I think the bindings came undone mainly when I failed to properly secure the "tail" of the binding into the (secondary) clip. My experience is that the clip should be as far as possible out laterally to be effective. Also, and it probably goes without saying, one should ratchet the binding pretty tight for the prong to really bite into the rubber hole.

Also, I should elaborate on where the crampons didn't bite. I was on steep, compact, frozen snow, trying to downclimb/traverse. I was too lazy to switch into crampons. All gear has limitations, and I tried to push the snowshoes past theirs.

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 154
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 154
My MSR Lightning Ascents work great in my particular stomping ground......Sierra concrete. I have the short tails but I rarely use them. But YMMV. The bindings can be a little finicky. They will come loose if not drawn very tightly. Also if your shoes do not have a firm upper, such as pac boots, the bindings will loosen up as they compress the boot.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 904
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 904
Thanks ms2119 and mtntrailrunner. The bindings of the Lightning Ascents coming undone when slightly loosened concerns me a bit. I had also considered the MSR Denali EVO Ascents but liked the lighter weight and more narrow heel of the Women's Lightning Ascent (I believe the straps are the same). I do like that the '07/'08 Lightning Ascent has (3) straps vs. just the (2) straps of previous years. Btw mtntrailrunner, I thought the tails would only attach to the Denali EVO Ascent.

Has anyone used both the Denali EVO Ascent and the Lightning Ascent that could compare the two?

Thanks!
MC smile


"The mountains are measured for their height but the achievements of one who climbs the mountains are immeasurable." m.c.
http://www.facebook.com/keepclimbing
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 154
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 154
I stand corrected. My snowshoes are Denali Evo Ascents. Sorry for the confusion.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 139
Member
Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 139
I recently bought a pair of the standard Denali snowshoes after looking at quite a few different models. The EVO Ascents looked great and I almost bought those, but they will accept only a 6 inch tail vs. an 8 inch tail for the standard Denali, so I went with the regular Denali with an 8 inch tail. I figure I need every square inch of flotation possible when using a heavy pack. I recently used them on an overnight snowcamp and am very happy with the binding fit, secureness, and overall performance.


Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 44 (0.022s) Memory: 0.7643 MB (Peak: 0.8638 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-19 13:53:43 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS