Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#47927 06/01/08 06:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
Member
Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
Hi,

Has anyone tried using the new SPOT satellite messenger in the JMT / Whitney vicinity? I've read some very mixed reviews on its reliability.

http://www.findmespot.com/Home.aspx

Thanks!

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,190
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,190
Richard P's Board has an educational thread on the subject, largely based on Richard's recent experiences with the device.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 176
Member
Member

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 176
I'm in the process of updating my own Spot Messenger Review after a winter's worth of use in the backcountry.

My impression of the device remains the same, but I've developed a better understanding of its limitations.

* Don't expect the tracking (ping) service to work. Spot doesn't like to talk and walk, making tracking (almost) useless.

* Expect a motionless Spot to need a clear view of the sky and 20 minutes or more to send an OK message. Ideally, plan your spot use to coincide with breaks: lunch, camp, etc., where you can sit Spot on a rock, press the button, and leave it alone.

* I was able to send out messages by pressing the button and then stashing Spot pointing upward in my backpack's lid pocket while I continued hiking. This was not always successful, however.

* Spot seems to have no trouble reading a GPS signal. The problems are all related to outbound connections.

Is Spot 100% reliable? Nope. But nothing is. Spot does generally work as advertised, given the limitations I've noted above. Spot absolutely gives you the ability to send "I'm Okay" messages from darn near anywhere.

Whether or not this makes you safer in the backcountry, as well as choosing how best to use this technology is another issue--and not as straightforward as it may seem.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
As long as you follow the cumbersome limitations on use, yes it works reliably. Worked for us in AK last week.

The tracking function is not worth the price because it does not track a moving person or car very well. Besides, they just started a web page that you can share that will track your OK messages from the last 24 hours. That works fine.

It's a nice product with a lot of potential and room for improvement in the hardware. The cost is very good compared to PLBs. They are different animals though.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7
Member
Member

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7
used it about (3) weeks ago when my group summited whitney. tracking was kinda of sketchy, but everytime we sent an okay message it was reliable. although just to make sure we restart the unit everytime before sending the "ok" message. i guess this was to see the sequence of led confirmations.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
Member
Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
Thanks, everyone! I wasn't planning to get the tracking service since that seems to be very sketchy. I'm more concerned with it reliably delivering the OK messages.

Good to hear that it does seem to work in the vicinity.


Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 28 (0.029s) Memory: 0.7149 MB (Peak: 0.7778 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-06 03:21:48 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS