Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
There is a remarkable sinkhole north of the trail camp. It's right on the pass/saddle at the top of the canyon which leads to Mirror lake, slightly NNW of Wotans Throne. The approximate GPS of the sinkhole: 36, 34.077'N; 118, 16.913W. It looks like the collapse happened recently, judging from the color of the dirt. This photo was taken Sept. 18, 2009, looking toward the north or northeast.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 250
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 250
Very cool photo of the hole, and it does look new.
I can't get a sense of the size of the hole in the photo. What was the diameter?


climbSTRONG
"Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing" -Helen Keller
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
The diameter of the crater is approximately 12 feet. It's approx. 6 feet deep. I didn't climb down into it, partly because I wanted to leave it untouched.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 95
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 95
I saw this on Aug 29 when I was up there doing Wotan's Throne.

I wasn't in photo mode as I walked by it. Thanks for capturing it to prove that I wasn't imagining things.

I don't know what could have caused this. It sure looks like a sinkhole, but can you get a sinkhole in a glacieral moraine? I thought you only got sinkholes in limestone!

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 585
Member
Member

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 585
I noticed something similar to this when I was doing Langley on Thursday. It wasn't quite as wide or as deep, and am quite sure it wasn't there the last time I did Langley in October of last year.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 200
Member
Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 200
Originally Posted By Joel M. Baldwin
I saw this on Aug 29 when I was up there doing Wotan's Throne.

I wasn't in photo mode as I walked by it. Thanks for capturing it to prove that I wasn't imagining things.

I don't know what could have caused this. It sure looks like a sinkhole, but can you get a sinkhole in a glacieral moraine? I thought you only got sinkholes in limestone!


Prolly caused by a broken water main. You know, the one that serves the Starbucks wink


Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 111
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 111
It almost looks like a huge boulder was removed from the earth, and that is the hole it left.


What is above knows what is below, but what is below does not know what is above. Thats why i climb!
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 460
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 460
2dtrail probably hit the nail on the head. It was likely created by a large boulder falling from above and that is the first dent it made before coming to rest somewhere further down the hill. Lucky you weren't standing there to witness the event.


Richard
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
As a geologist, my assesment is that it is not an impact crater. The top edges are too sharp, and where's the rock and cliff that it fell from. there would be debris shooting out from the middle of the hole (non visible. Looks like it is probaly from a sinkhole type phenomenae. Perhaps there was a large section of ice below it that finally has melted leaving a void. It does not appear to be an area underlain by solid rock. THis would be the best time of year for the underground melting to occur. wish I could go check it out myself.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 7
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 7


This interesting hole was found at the notch on the East Ridge of Candlelight Peak. It appeared to be a fairly new also, and I was surprised that it turned out to be a tunnel.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 720
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 720
No, you got it all wrong! smile It's one of them thar a "crop" circles. grin

Then again, that is one heckuva pit for a WAG bag. Anyone see Paul Bunyan in the area?

Fumarole? Then there would be cause for concern. But there ain't no steam rising from the crater. shocked

Caused by: ground settling and rocks shifting from ice melt or tremors?

Gotta love the mysteries of the Sierra Nevada. Another excuse to go out there and see it for one's self!

Have fun.


Journey well...
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 250
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 250
This thread reminds me of Aron Ralston's quote from his book Between a Rock and a Hard Place: "Geologic time includes NOW".


climbSTRONG
"Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing" -Helen Keller
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 196
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 196
Could they be a result of all the Seismic activity going on, kind of like a precursor the recent events around the world. All of those faults a kind of interconnected?


Why Yes, I am crazy. I'm just not stupid.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 720
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 720
It's always the fault's "fault." wink


Journey well...
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 985
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 985
I'm sure it's just those Tremors worms from down in the valley. (Call Kevin Bacon, I'm sure he's a friend of somebody on the board...)

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
Member
Member

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
I don't know Kevin...but I have a friend who knows a guy whose brother.....

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 202
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 202
The picture shows that the soil near the surface there is comprised of a well consolidated blend of mostly fine grained sand & silt with some small rock. I would say this surface is more of an alluvial deposit than a glacial moraine. There could be an older glacial moraine deeper. This deeper layer of bigger, boulder sized rocks could have lots of voids or spaces between the rocks where the fine grained soil has not filled in. Ground water flow could cause the smaller, fine grained soil to wash down in to the voids and cause the sink hole to form on the surface. It's like sub-surface erosion. Its not likely that that a centuries old underground ice formation recently melted there. Water flows freely through voids between the rock in a moraine. The temperature below the surface increases with depth and ice would not form or be preserved at that depth.

Whatever had kept the surface layers bridged over the voids below has now been breached. So this area may likely see more subsidence in the future as more water will now be drawn to this localized depression.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
Member
Member

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
Originally Posted By Rick F
The picture shows that the soil near the surface there is comprised of a well consolidated blend of mostly fine grained sand & silt with some small rock. I would say this surface is more of an alluvial deposit than a glacial moraine. There could be an older glacial moraine deeper. This deeper layer of bigger, boulder sized rocks could have lots of voids or spaces between the rocks where the fine grained soil has not filled in. Ground water flow could cause the smaller, fine grained soil to wash down in to the voids and cause the sink hole to form on the surface. It's like sub-surface erosion. Its not likely that that a centuries old underground ice formation recently melted there. Water flows freely through voids between the rock in a moraine. The temperature below the surface increases with depth and ice would not form or be preserved at that depth.

Whatever had kept the surface layers bridged over the voids below has now been breached. So this area may likely see more subsidence in the future as more water will now be drawn to this localized depression.



Rick F,

Temperature does not increase with depth untill you get well below the ground surface. In the upper few hundred feet it is very uniform. However, each winter water freezes if it is trapped just below the ground surface and then will melt during the summer months if temperatures are hot enough. (just like perma frost).
The larger boulders are probably from the surface and mixed in with the rest of the exposure. Ground water flow would be heaviest in the late spring and summer months, not in the fall.
The water flows in the rivers and sprngs in the late summer and fall is from the few visible snow fields and from ice that frozen from the past winter and trapped just below the ground surface. This is very common throughout the sierra's.

From the coordinates and using google earth, plus looking at the deposits they do not appear to be alluvial. Alluvial deposits are usually layered. The mixed nature of the variious size of deposit is more like a debris flow or moraine type deposit.
I'm sticking to my first guess of being related to melting ice just below the ground surface, however it could just be a void below collapsed, like the cool picture of the natural tunnel.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 202
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 202
Originally Posted By dont

Rick F,

Temperature does not increase with depth untill you get well below the ground surface. In the upper few hundred feet it is very uniform. However, each winter water freezes if it is trapped just below the ground surface and then will melt during the summer months if temperatures are hot enough. (just like perma frost).
The larger boulders are probably from the surface and mixed in with the rest of the exposure. Ground water flow would be heaviest in the late spring and summer months, not in the fall.
The water flows in the rivers and sprngs in the late summer and fall is from the few visible snow fields and from ice that frozen from the past winter and trapped just below the ground surface. This is very common throughout the sierra's.

From the coordinates and using google earth, plus looking at the deposits they do not appear to be alluvial. Alluvial deposits are usually layered. The mixed nature of the variious size of deposit is more like a debris flow or moraine type deposit.
I'm sticking to my first guess of being related to melting ice just below the ground surface, however it could just be a void below collapsed, like the cool picture of the natural tunnel.


Dont,

I respect your opinion and I concur with your conclusion, based on only the visual evaluation we have of the the picture, that the deposit on the surface is most likely the upper layer of a debri flow. However, this debris flow is not like the waves of terminal moraines we see in the broad gully between Pinnacle Ridge and the south facing slopes below the basin that impounds Iceberg Lake.

I also maintain that temperature does increase with depth even at shallow dimensions. The earth is very hot at its core. the upper layers of soil, even at shallow depths, insulate and help slow the loss of Earth's heat into the cooler atmosphere. This is why in areas with seasonal freezing temperatures, water lines are buried at depths of 6 feet to prevent freezing. If what you are saying is true waterlines would have to buried hundreds of feet to prevent freezing.

Another thing many of us notice as evidence of this is that when crossing moraines, even when its freezing and there is ice & snow on the surface, you can still hear water running down below. The water stops flowing only when the source on the surface is frozen, not because the flow itself is frozen below.

The sink-hole could not be caused by the sudden loss of volume due to recently thawing ice. Permeation of fine-grained debris into voids, very likely. Seismic shifting, possibly.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 548
Member
Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 548
Originally Posted By RickF
I also maintain that temperature does increase with depth even at shallow dimensions. The earth is very hot at its core. the upper layers of soil, even at shallow depths, insulate and help slow the loss of Earth's heat into the cooler atmosphere. This is why in areas with seasonal freezing temperatures, water lines are buried at depths of 6 feet to prevent freezing. If what you are saying is true waterlines would have to buried hundreds of feet to prevent freezing.


Rick, the prevention of freezing past the first couple of feet is more a function of the thermal mass of the soil/rock. Once you get a couple of feet down, the temperature of the ground approaches the climatic mean temperature for the area. Here in MO, that's in the mid to upper 50s and you find that caves down several hundred feet tend to stay about that temperature, varying only a few degrees from summer to winter. That's why foundations, footings, etc., have to be a certain depth depending on latitude and altitude, so the bottom of the footing is below the frost line and the structure isn't subject to frost heave from the freezing and thawing of the top couple of feet of earth.

I believe you have to go down many hundreds to a thousand feet before you start to get appreciable warming from the core temperature conducting upward. (Unless, of course, you're standing on top of a recently-active volcano like the Long Valley Caldera near Mammoth!)

(Disclaimer) I'm an engineer, not a geologist but I've spent a fair amount of time in various "tourist" caves all around the country and enough time in spring-fed water to have a very good idea of "climactic mean temperatures" in various places. (Usually, brrrrrrrrr!)

Last edited by Alan; 10/03/09 02:37 AM. Reason: Added volcano comment
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.032s Queries: 57 (0.013s) Memory: 0.8044 MB (Peak: 0.9482 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-03-15 05:02:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS