Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#15092 07/18/04 01:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 40
For all you Superfeet users out there...I know there are lots of you. I bought the Green ones for my trail runner/hikers and wore them for about 10 days. Never stopped feeling like I was walking on a lump right under my arches. The arch support seemed to high and it bugged me. I took em back and went back to the original insoles. Should I have waited it out. They otherwise felt pretty good. Would my arches have eventually adjusted?

#15093 07/18/04 03:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
I never leave home without my Super Feet.
You have to make sure they fit your shoe right.
I'm thinking they were not fitted to your shoe right. I have never worn out a pair in 10 days.I would say try again.

#15094 07/18/04 03:31 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 441
Member
Member

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 441
I bought the green ones too and I also felt like there was a huge lump under my arches. I never could get used to them and they also caused my stride to be altered, causing groin pain. I threw mine out after 4 days. Maybe I should have given them more of a chance, but they bugged me.

#15095 07/18/04 05:37 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 72
Member
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 72
Don't superfeet have two different arch heights? I had to abandon my superfeet. They felt great around the house, but not after a couple hours with a backpack. I need metatarsal support to prevent numb toes. I found inserts with metatarsal support at a shoe store where they also do custom orthotics (which I've had in the past but don't really need). The new inserts are also cushier; they have less friction underfoot.

My inserts are (according to the box) Apex Lynco Biomechanical Orthotic Systems L425 with sports top cover, posted heel, w/Met (?), and arch support. I didn't do any comparison shopping. These cost a bit more than the standard superfeet.

Arch supports and metatarsal supports initially felt funny to me, like a lump, but I got used to them and have much less foot pain with them.

#15096 07/19/04 02:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 94
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 94
I have a high arch and supposedly I'm better off hiking with Superfeet or an other arch support. I've tried everything on the market. I must have really weird feet because I always feel as if the archs are either under the ball of my feet or at the heel - never at the arch. I can't wear Montrail or Vasque boots because of it. I finally gave up and have been happy as a lark without any support. I love my Lowas and my Northface hikers. Maybe it's just a case of "if it's not broke, don't fix it."

#15097 08/19/04 05:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
For high arches, especially with a pack on, superfeet are good. BUT to make them better, go to the 3/4 length model, (more room for the toes), and boil them per the instuctions (3 minutes?) and add bend to increase arc.


Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.028s Queries: 27 (0.017s) Memory: 0.7123 MB (Peak: 0.7731 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-19 05:56:09 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS