Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#57170 01/08/09 05:50 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Doug has been working on getting a webcam pointed at Mt. Whitney lately, but not without some issues. Here are some of the details:

Doug has a new Windows Vista computer he hopes to use to run the webcam. The problem is that the Webcam32 software that he has does not work on Vista -- it can't "see" the camera when he hooks it up to the computer. Or it may be that the camera is not compatible with Vista. Whatever the reason, the old camera and software does not work on the new computer.

So plan B was recommended by Old Alpiner from San Diego. He pointed us to the Cuyamaca Mountain WebCam in San Diego. It uses a Stardot webcam. It is a nice setup, since it contains its own computer software so it does not require a computer to upload its pictures to a web site. These cameras are in operation in Yosemite -- three of web cameras are Stardot systems. However, these cameras don't have the zoom focal lengths it would take to get a decent picture of Mt. Whitney from Lone Pine.

Plan C: I located a Grand Teton web cam, www.tetoncam.com and the site shows it is located over 13 miles from Grand Teton, yet the pictures are outstanding. ( Unfortunately, the power is out on that camera so the picture stuck at 1/3/09. When I first found the site, the picture was fantastic. ) I emailed Pat at the site, and he says his camera is an Olympus C-740 UZ (ultra zoom), which has a 10x (380mm) lens. That model has software that allows it to communicate with computer software, so it can be operated from a computer. Pat at TetonCam uses a combination of software from Cam2com, Imagemagick and Windows batch scripts to take pictures, format them to different sizes, and upload them on regular timed intervals. Pat is sending me his Windows scripts so I can maybe start with those.

Doug called Olympus and the sales rep convinced him to buy a new Ultra Zoom camera, the Olympus SP 565 UZ, with a 20x zoom. The sales rep thought it would be better (more compatible). Unfortunately, I searched for clues, and finally contacted Olympus tech support, and they responded that the 565 does NOT have the computer communications (SDK) software. So here we are back to...

Plan D: We can get a used Olympus C-740. But we have not proceeded on that.

In the mean time, Richard P has agreed to take some shots of Whitney from Lone Pine at different zoom settings so we can see how pictures might appear.

I'll try to post updates as we move ahead.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 548
Member
Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 548
Steve, you might check out the San Francisco Peaks webcam site that shows Agassiz Peak and some of the rest of the ridgeline looking north from Flagstaff, AZ.

A while back, I set up a web cam at our church to watch construction of our new building and I got some good pointers from the guy who runs the SF Peaks site.

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Thanks, Alan. I sent of an email asking some questions, especially how far their camera is from the peak.

Edit:  Dan from the SF Peaks wrote back:
Quote:
Camera is about seven miles from the Peaks. It is an Axis 2120 but I'd look into the Mobotix line if buying one now. Mobotix cmos cameras are not damaged by direct sun. Here is link to M22M we use at work: http://www.rmrs.nau.edu/fortvalley/webcam.shtml As for lenses I have to look that up. Maybe the Mobotix site http://www.mobotix.com/eng_US/region/index/eng_US/?URL=Products/Lens-Options will help with lens determination. Both these cameras are network cameras and have web server built in. I really am impressed with the mobotix line.

His FortValley webcam is cool -- they have a bird feeder right in front of the camera, so many of their pictures have either a squirrel or bird in the picture. smile

Checking the Mobotix web site, their Allround M22M-IT $798 can be fitted with a 135mm zoom, giving us a 2.6 mile wide view of Mt. Whitney (seems a bit wider than I'd like), and the resolution is only 640x480.

Last edited by Steve C; 01/09/09 05:48 AM.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 9
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 9
Found a new-in-box C-740 for $230. Will it work on Doug's computer with the scripts you're getting from the Teton guy?

Would donating an old computer with XP on it help?

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 3
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 3
Hi Ok I should list the "Parts as of now" I think I have two old systems that use XP or 95, a sony es 60 webcam, and a D-400 Olympus and the new SP-565 at least 3 software systems that will work but not with Vista or one of the cameras, when we use the old system we had a webcam on full time and a software demo download from webcam32 ran the cam input thru a firewire into the video input and the software would capture a photo at a set time send it to a position on the webpage FTP address. So I will send the Sony cam in and have the battery/ charger checked. and Then try to link the D-400 camera serial output into Vista with a RS232/USB system and the software that was sending photos out of the windows photo folder.

Looks like the kinks are in the old/new not resolved software version updates and failure with a set of industry standards We will mix and match until we get a fix. Thanks Doug

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Answering Richard's comments:
> Found a new-in-box C-740 for $230.

Amazon.com shows several used priced between $60 and $110.

Ebay reports an average price under $50 for the camera. Here's the Ebay C-740 link.

> Will it work on Doug's computer with the scripts you're getting from the Teton guy?

Theoretically, yes.  Olympus shows these cameras. Note the C-740 is listed under the "Rye" SDK software. Cam2Com lists the C-740 under the "Rye" SDK, which they say works on Vista. And from that Olympus list, I found the SP-500 Ultra Zoom -- it's got better resolution than the C-740. ...so I'm drooling over that one.

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 3
Member
Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 3
Hi Richard I would like the contact info for the 740 camera I will return the SP 565 Thanks Doug

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Ok, we have a camera. I just bought this on Ebay for $61:


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 43
Member
Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 43
Just curious, how is this website funded? I would certainly be willing to donate a modest amount to fund cameras, software and other costs.

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

> Just curious, how is this website funded?

It works something like this: You go to Whitney Portal, walk into the store and buy a burger or one of those pancakes. Or you spend some cash and stay the night at the Whitney Portal Hostel. Then Doug takes the proceeds and pays the ISP provider once in a while.

And some of us work on it just for the fun.   crazy

However, if there is enough support, we could maybe set up a way to donate to support things like buying camera equipment. I have even thought about joining forces with Friends of the Inyo, but haven't looked into that at all yet.


Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 9
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,434
Likes: 9
Originally Posted By Steve C
In the mean time, Richard P has agreed to take some shots of Whitney from Lone Pine at different zoom settings so we can see how pictures might appear.


Stopped by the Hostel on the way home yesterday afternoon. The light wasn't very good, but you can see what the view is like at various focal lengths. Hopefully, the third floor is high enough to clear the wires.


Had to shoot from the second floor walkway.


24mm.


88mm.


120mm.


160mm.


224mm.


320mm.


400mm.


480mm.

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Thanks so much Richard! So if we can get the 380mm 10x zoom working, it will be quite close to your 400mm picture.

I wonder if Wayne or someone else can figure out whether the setting sun would fall into that picture at any time of the year. I am worried what direct sun exposure would do to the camera.


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 137
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 137
Originally Posted By Steve C
I am worried what direct sun exposure would do to the camera.

i was wondering the same about the camera pointed at the light bulb on the main page.


bsmith

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Member
Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Steve, if I figured right, the setting sun would hit the lens using the 380mm setting from about February 25 to March 6, and from October 5 to October 15. So, the setting sun is definitely something to consider.

Last edited by Wayne; 01/12/09 02:35 PM. Reason: Recalculated.
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Originally Posted By bsmith
i was wondering the same about the camera pointed at the light bulb on the main page.

Oh... that one! I wondered if anyone noticed. It is just a snapshot that somehow got uploaded while Doug was experimenting with his web cam software.

Sorry, but it isn't a live picture. smile

Wayne wrote:
> April 18 to April 25, and from August 24 to August 27.

Mercy, you're fast, Wayne! Thanks so much.

Hmmm... why 8 days in April, but only 4 in August?

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Member
Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Well, humble pie for me...

I went back to the drawing board and found my calcs were wrong.

Sunsets over Whitney as viewed from the Whitney Portal Hostel, using a 380MM 10x lens, would be from February 25 to March 6, and from October 5 to October 15--about 10 days for each period.

A wider lens view would take in even more direct-sun days.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Thanks Steve, it looks like there is some real progress being made towards making this webcam a reality.
BTW, speaking about how this business gets done, I think all of us who monitor this Board regularly owe Steve C a great big Thank You for all of the hard work that he puts into keeping things running, and for little rewards, except for the occasional word of encouragement that he may get from the likes of us users. Thanks again Steve, from all of us out here for helping to make this webcam happen.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 132
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 132
Hey Steve, checked out your teton cam and the archived shot they have is great. I was a little disappointed that it's from the Idaho side. I found a site that has a bunch of Jackson Hole cams but none directly east of the Grand. If you haven't seen these yet check them out here: http://www.jacksonholenet.com/webcams/


Always do right - this will gratify some and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Old Alpiner: I appreciate the compliment.

Whitrat:
Teton cam is still stuck on an old frame. Pat there told me he had power issues, so that may still be the problem. Once he gets it working, you will see how great the picture is from his side of the mountain.

Yes, I saw the Teton webcam list. Clicking on the JH Resort - Teton Village link, and then on the picture, brings up a window with the larger camera picture, with this at the bottom:

Quote:
We need your help! We are running out of resources to properly maintain this website. Our biggest expenses are the servers and bandwidth needed to keep the cams running at an acceptable reload/refresh rate. If you enjoy this website and enjoy the cam images displayed please consider donating 5 dollars per year to help support our operation costs and future expansions. We know the cams are important! Please let us know they are important to you by helping us keep them going and growing!

I hope our posting pictures doesn't increase our website band width to the point that the hosting service comes asking Doug for more $$. I'll be monitoring that.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 137
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 137
Originally Posted By Steve C
Originally Posted By bsmith
i was wondering the same about the camera pointed at the light bulb on the main page.

Oh... that one! I wondered if anyone noticed. It is just a snapshot that somehow got uploaded while Doug was experimenting with his web cam software.

Sorry, but it isn't a live picture. smile


i am happy that it wasn't. i'm not sure, but i think that's called 'burn in' or 'fry the lens' ?? grin


bsmith

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.046s Queries: 56 (0.022s) Memory: 0.7926 MB (Peak: 0.9426 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-06 20:24:41 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS