Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 138
Member
Member

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 138
I have been using the Trango S, Trango Extreme and Koflach Expe for all of my mountaineering adventures. Trango S is a summer boot with comfort for long hikes. I did the JMT with it.

Trango Extreme is one grade below Nepal in terms of insulation. I've used it for most winter trips in the Sierra and ice climbing in Lee Vining. It should be good for all winter outings in CA except on the coldest of days.

The Koflach is probably one of the warmest boots outside of the Himalayan $1,000 boots. I've used it for Denali, Rainier in summer, spring & winter,6,000m peaks in the Peruvian Andes. I've done long approaches in them. They are not as good compared to the single boots but they are not bad. You'll get used to the awkwardness walking on flat grounds after a few trips. They are becoming obsolete as the newer single boots are becoming increasing warmer. I don't think they are being made anymore. You can find probably find a cheap pair somewhere online.

The first time I went to Orizaba I used the Montrail backpacking boots. The second time I used the Trango S. It depends on the time of the year you want to do these peaks and the current conditions. Same as Rainier. Trango S would be fine in the summer on Rainier but you'll probably lose some toes if doing it in the winter.



When in doubt, go up.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 380
Member
Member

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 380
Originally Posted By kevin_trieu
I have been using the Trango S, Trango Extreme and Koflach Expe for all of my mountaineering adventures. Trango S is a summer boot with comfort for long hikes. I did the JMT with it.


used the Trango S for three JMTs, but after the alst one I am done with it. Not very durable is one issue(one was replaced under warranty, second now pretty shot but still holding together), but my biggest issue is the lack of cushioning in the front part of the boot and the really tight toe box. I already wear the thing half a size larger than I should and I still get bruised toes in there after just a day or two.

strengths - lightweight for the level of support, and pretty decent breathability, zero break-in time. Ties quickly and waterproof for quick stream crossings that aren't too deep.

For my next big hike, I am looking for a boot similar to the Trango S but with slightly more comfort. 15 years ago I had a pair of Meindl trekking boots that were just about perfect for my needs. Can't get my hands on Meindl boots in the US, though.



Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Fishmonger - check out the Kayland MXTs. I have the same opinion about the Trango S as you do. I love my MXTs... same basic idea as the Trango S, with a better toe box shape and a little more cushioning. Last year's black model is really cheap now too. I use 10.5 and I normally wear 10 in everything.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 380
Member
Member

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 380
thanks, I'll check them out - you are talking about these?
http://www.zappos.com/n/p/p/7385720/c/147.html

see them for even less at some other outlets, but not in size 11, which usually fits me comfortably.


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Yeah, those are the ones. I have used them to climb class 5 rock, crampon steep neve, as well as trek and summit Kilimanjaro. 30% off isn't bad either. Maybe I'll get another pair of the black ones.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.056s Queries: 24 (0.030s) Memory: 0.7180 MB (Peak: 0.7785 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-06 08:50:15 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS